Orionbelt Semantic Layer vs QueryWeaver

In-depth architectural comparison of the Orionbelt Semantic Layer and QueryWeaver MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Orionbelt Semantic Layer when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Orionbelt Semantic Layer Details

Choose QueryWeaver when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore QueryWeaver Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Orionbelt Semantic Layer Databases	QueryWeaver Databases
Summary	API-first semantic layer MCP server compiling YAML models into dialect-specific SQL	An MCP server for Text2SQL: transforms natural language into SQL using graph schema understanding.
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orionbelt-semantic-layer": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "orionbelt-semantic-layer-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "queryweaver": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "queryweaver"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons