Orionbelt Analytics vs Dbhub

In-depth architectural comparison of the Orionbelt Analytics and Dbhub MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Orionbelt Analytics when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: connect_database, list_schemas, reset_cache.

Explore Orionbelt Analytics Details

Choose Dbhub when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Dbhub Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Orionbelt Analytics Databases	Dbhub Databases
Summary	Ontology-based MCP server for database schema analysis and RDF/OWL ontology generation	Minimal Database MCP Server for PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, SQLite, MariaDB
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orionbelt-analytics": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-remote",
        "http://localhost:9000/mcp",
        "--transport",
        "http-only"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dbhub": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@bytebase/dbhub@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons