Orbit vs Sidereon

In-depth architectural comparison of the Orbit and Sidereon MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Orbit when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Orbit Details

S

Choose Sidereon when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sidereon Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Orbit Aerospace & Astrodynamics	S Sidereon Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	Task management for people and AI agents, with scoped OAuth access to issues, projects, and docs.	GNSS positioning and astrodynamics: orbit propagation, passes, GNSS solves, and RINEX QC
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orbit-3": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "orbit-3"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sidereon": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sidereon"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons