Contracts Wizard vs TickerRisk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Contracts Wizard and TickerRisk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Contracts Wizard when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Supports multiple smart contract languages, Generates code from audited OpenZeppelin contract templates, Interactive parameter and feature selection.

Explore Contracts Wizard Details

Choose TickerRisk when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: scan_ticker, find_wheel_candidates, find_covered_calls.

Explore TickerRisk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Contracts Wizard OpenZeppelin Legal	TickerRisk Legal
Summary	A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI agents to generate secure smart contracts in multiples languages based on OpenZeppelin Wizard templates.	Check options trades for hidden catalysts (earnings, FDA, legal, SEC) before you sell premium.
Category & Scope	Legal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openzeppelin-contracts-wizard": {
      "url": "https://mcp.openzeppelin.com"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "tickerrisk": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "tickerrisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons