Openunfurl vs Velog

In-depth architectural comparison of the Openunfurl and Velog MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Openunfurl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Openunfurl Details

V

Choose Velog when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: velog_get_post, velog_list_posts, velog_search_posts.

Explore Velog Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Openunfurl Developer Tools	V Velog Developer Tools
Summary	Zero-signup anonymous link-unfurl API. One GET returns clean JSON metadata for any public URL.	Read and write Velog (velog.io), the Korean developer blog. Public publishing is opt-in.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openunfurl": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vercel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "velog": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@milcho0604/velog-mcp@0.8.10"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons