Openunfurl vs Public Suffix List

In-depth architectural comparison of the Openunfurl and Public Suffix List MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Openunfurl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Openunfurl Details

Choose Public Suffix List when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Public Suffix List Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Openunfurl Developer Tools	Public Suffix List Developer Tools
Summary	Zero-signup anonymous link-unfurl API. One GET returns clean JSON metadata for any public URL.	Mozilla Public Suffix List — eTLD parser (cached 24h)
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openunfurl": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "vercel"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "public-suffix-list": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "public-suffix-list"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons