Openrouter vs Promptsharp
A side-by-side look at the Openrouter and Promptsharp MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
P
PromptsharpConversational AIProfessional prompt library over remote MCP: 175 prompts, 13 verticals. Free discovery scope.37FairAuth: not declaredVerdict: choose Openrouter for conversational ai work as a local process; choose Promptsharp for conversational ai. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Openrouter when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
- You prefer a local stdio subprocess transport.
- You want tools like
list_models, get_model, compare_models.
PChoose Promptsharp when
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Conversational AI domain.
Feature & specification comparison
Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | P Promptsharp | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Conversational AI | Conversational AI |
| Quality signal | 56/100 · Good | 37/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Not confirmed yet |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | — |
| Auth | Not declared | Not declared |
| Pricing | Not declared | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | None listed |
| Verified owner | Community listing | Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | — |
| Directory activity | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
| Tools | 3 | Not listed |
| Full listing | View Openrouter | View Promptsharp |
Tools & capabilities
Openrouter tools 3
list_modelsList LLMs from the OpenRouter catalog (~340 models across all major providers) with normalized $/1M-token pricing, context windows, and modality. Filter by search, free-only, minimum context, or modality (e.g. "image" for vision models). Sorted cheapest-first by completion price. Keyless.get_modelGet full details for one OpenRouter model by id — normalized $/1M pricing (prompt, completion, plus per-request/image/web-search costs), context window, modality, supported parameters, tokenizer, knowledge cutoff. e.g. id "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5". Keyless.compare_modelsSide-by-side comparison of pricing ($/1M tokens), context window, and modality for 2-5 OpenRouter models. Answers "is claude-sonnet-4.5 cheaper than gpt-4o". Keyless.
Promptsharp tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Openrouter
{
"mcpServers": {
"openrouter": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@pipeworx/mcp-openrouter"
]
}
}
}
Promptsharp
No confirmed install command for Promptsharp yet — follow the setup steps linked from its listing page rather than a guessed package name.
Frequently asked questions
Openrouter is categorized under Conversational AI and uses a local stdio subprocess. Promptsharp belongs to Conversational AI and uses an install path we have not confirmed yet. Pick Openrouter for conversational ai work and Promptsharp for conversational ai.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client. Promptsharp has no confirmed install command yet — follow its own setup instructions.
Openrouter has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Promptsharp has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add openrouter and promptsharp as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Openrouter has a quality signal of 56/100 (Good) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Promptsharp has 37/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.