OpenRouter vs MCP Time

In-depth architectural comparison of the OpenRouter and MCP Time MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose OpenRouter when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: chat, generate_image, embed.

Explore OpenRouter Details

Choose MCP Time when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MCP Time Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O OpenRouter Developer Tools	MCP Time Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server providing access to 300+ AI models via OpenRouter	Time MCP server via HTTP
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openrouter-2": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-openrouter"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-time": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "npx"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons