A side-by-side look at the Openreview and Scopus Plus MCP MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Openreview for research work as a local process; choose Scopus Plus MCP for research as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
SCOPUS_API_KEY.Rows where the two servers differ are marked.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Research | Research |
| Quality signal | 41/100 · Fair | 36/100 · Fair |
| Install command | Confirmed | Confirmed |
| Transport | Local subprocess (stdio) | Local subprocess (stdio) |
| Auth | Not declared | Not declared |
| Pricing | Not declared | Not declared |
| Required env vars | None listed | SCOPUS_API_KEY |
| Verified owner |
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
{
"mcpServers": {
"openreview": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@pipeworx/mcp-openreview"
]
}
}
}
{
"mcpServers": {
"scopus-plus-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"scopus-plus-mcp"
],
"env": {
"SCOPUS_API_KEY": "YOUR_SCOPUS_API_KEY_HERE"
}
}
}
}
| Community listing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Directory activity | 1 views 0 installs 0 upvotes | 0 views 0 installs 0 upvotes |
|---|
| Tools | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Full listing | View Openreview | View Scopus Plus MCP |
|---|