In-depth architectural comparison of the OpenRevenue and MCP Server Docker MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
OpenRevenue
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
MCP Server Docker
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 52/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose OpenRevenue if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose MCP Server Docker if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
O
Choose OpenRevenue when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
OpenRevenue is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, MCP Server Docker belongs to Developer Tools using local stdio subprocess. Select OpenRevenue when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and MCP Server Docker when you require tools for developer tools.