What is the key difference between Openpost and Runekist?

Openpost belongs to the Developer Tools category with local stdio execution, while Runekist belongs to the Developer Tools category with cloud HTTP/SSE execution.

How do I install Openpost or Runekist in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Openpost and Runekist free or paid?

Openpost operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Runekist operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Openpost lists 0 tools with 2 views and 617 GitHub stars. Runekist lists 0 tools with 0 views and 0 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Openpost and Runekist together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Openpost vs Runekist

In-depth architectural comparison of the Openpost and Runekist MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Openpost

Developer Tools · Local stdio

Quality: 41/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Runekist

Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE

Quality: 30/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Openpost if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Runekist if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Openpost when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Openpost Details

Choose Runekist when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runekist Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Openpost Developer Tools	R Runekist Developer Tools
Summary	Manage social publishing workflows through OpenPost	Total Battle clan insights, chest rewards, and stacking calculations through Runekist.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Openpost Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Runekist Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Openpost Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openpost": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "openpost"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Runekist Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runekist": {
      "url": "https://runekist.com/mcp/setup"
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Openpost is categorized under Developer Tools and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Runekist belongs to Developer Tools using remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. Select Openpost when you need capabilities focused on developer tools and Runekist when you require tools for developer tools.

More alternatives to Openpost More alternatives to Runekist Developer Tools category hub