OpenHeritage Public S… vs Shanghai Library Open… | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
OpenHeritage Public Search vs Shanghai Library Open Data MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the OpenHeritage Public Search and Shanghai Library Open Data MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
OpenHeritage Public Search
Search & Data Extraction · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 45/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Shanghai Library Open Data MCP
Search & Data Extraction · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose OpenHeritage Public Search if you need specialized Search & Data Extraction tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Shanghai Library Open Data MCP if your workspace requires Search & Data Extraction integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose OpenHeritage Public Search when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
OpenHeritage Public Search is categorized under Search & Data Extraction and uses a remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport. In contrast, Shanghai Library Open Data MCP belongs to Search & Data Extraction using local stdio subprocess. Select OpenHeritage Public Search when you need capabilities focused on search & data extraction and Shanghai Library Open Data MCP when you require tools for search & data extraction.