OpenDataMCP vs ThriveStack PLG CRM

In-depth architectural comparison of the OpenDataMCP and ThriveStack PLG CRM MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose OpenDataMCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: CLI tool for managing MCP servers and data providers, Support for multiple open data providers with modular design, Templates and guidelines for publishing new data providers.

Explore OpenDataMCP Details

Choose ThriveStack PLG CRM when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_accounts, get_account_details, get_active_users_summary.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	OpenDataMCP OpenDataMCP Customer Data Platforms	ThriveStack PLG CRM Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Connect any Open Data to any LLM with Model Context Protocol.	ThriveStack PLG CRM analytics — query accounts, MAU/MTU, feature adoption, and PLG leads.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "opendatamcp-opendatamcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "odmcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "thrivestack-plg-crm": {
      "url": "https://api.app.thrivestack.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons