Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Opencages vs WOCLUB Protocol Gym
In-depth architectural comparison of the Opencages and WOCLUB Protocol Gym MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Opencages
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
WOCLUB Protocol Gym
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Opencages if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
O
Choose Opencages when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
W
Choose WOCLUB Protocol Gym when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Opencages Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Opencages Configuration
WOCLUB Protocol Gym Configuration