Openagenda vs Orderly MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Openagenda and Orderly MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Openagenda when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_agendas, events.

Explore Openagenda Details

Choose Orderly MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: wallet-connection, place-first-order, deposit-funds.

Explore Orderly MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Openagenda Developer Tools	Orderly MCP Developer Tools
Summary	OpenAgenda MCP.	MCP Server for Orderly Network - Documentation and SDK patterns
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openagenda-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "openagenda-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "orderly-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@orderly.network/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons