A side-by-side look at the Open Legal Chile and Wisconsin Code MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Open Legal Chile for legal work as a local process; choose Wisconsin Code for legal as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Open Legal Chile when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Legal domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Wisconsin Code tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Open Legal Chile is categorized under Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Wisconsin Code belongs to Legal and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Open Legal Chile for legal work and Wisconsin Code for legal.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Open Legal Chile has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Wisconsin Code has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add open-legal-chile and wisconsin-code as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Open Legal Chile has a quality signal of 41/100 (Fair) with 0 views, 0 installs and 5 GitHub stars. Wisconsin Code has 41/100 (Fair) with 1 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars.