OntoRamp Transformation Radar vs Sf Intelligence

In-depth architectural comparison of the OntoRamp Transformation Radar and Sf Intelligence MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose OntoRamp Transformation Radar when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_maturity_gap, get_initiative_risk, request_assessment.

Explore OntoRamp Transformation Radar Details

Choose Sf Intelligence when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Customer Data Platforms domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sf Intelligence Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	OntoRamp Transformation Radar Customer Data Platforms	Sf Intelligence Customer Data Platforms
Summary	Transformation readiness gaps and initiative risk signals for AI agents and enterprise change leads.	Offline, read-only MCP knowledge base for one Salesforce org's metadata, deps & impact.
Category & Scope	Customer Data Platforms	Customer Data Platforms

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ontoramp-transformation-radar": {
      "url": "https://mcp.ontoramp.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sf-intelligence": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sf-intelligence"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons