Onelogin MCP vs Floom

In-depth architectural comparison of the Onelogin MCP and Floom MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Onelogin MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Onelogin MCP Details

Choose Floom when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Floom Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Onelogin MCP Developer Tools	Floom Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for OneLogin API - manage users, apps, roles, and authentication	Deploy Python functions as web apps with auto-generated UI, REST API, and shareable links.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "onelogin-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "onelogin-mcp-setup"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "floom": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@floomhq/floom"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons