Onchain Safety MCP vs Solrisk MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Onchain Safety MCP and Solrisk MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Onchain Safety MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Onchain Safety MCP Details

Choose Solrisk MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Solrisk MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Onchain Safety MCP Finance & Fintech	Solrisk MCP Finance & Fintech
Summary	Token-safety for AI agents: rug/honeypot verdict + score across PulseChain, Monad, Base & BSC	Solana token risk (rug / honeypot / dump) scoring for AI agents — remote MCP server.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "onchain-safety-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "github:aitools420/onchain-safety-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "solrisk-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "solrisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons