Omnicall — Agent Tools Gateway vs PyreCrawl

In-depth architectural comparison of the Omnicall — Agent Tools Gateway and PyreCrawl MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Omnicall — Agent Tools Gateway when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Omnicall — Agent Tools Gateway Details

Choose PyreCrawl when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore PyreCrawl Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Omnicall — Agent Tools Gateway Search & Data Extraction	PyreCrawl Search & Data Extraction
Summary	247 LLMs + image/video/voice/music gen + crypto/DeFi/markets/web-search. Pay-per-call USDC, no key.	One tool for AI agents to scrape, crawl, extract, map, and search the web. Self-hosted, no API keys.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "omnicall-agent-tools-gateway": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "omnicall-agent-tools-gateway"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pyrecrawl": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "pyrecrawl@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons