Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Okx vs Bitfinex
In-depth architectural comparison of the Okx and Bitfinex MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Okx
Developer Tools · Local stdio
Quality: 21/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Bitfinex
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 47/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Okx if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a local process. Choose Bitfinex if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
O
Choose Okx when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
B
Choose Bitfinex when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
- Primary tools included: ALL, tBTCUSD.
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Okx Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Bitfinex Tools (2)
ALL
tBTCUSD
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Okx Configuration
Bitfinex Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to OkxMore alternatives to BitfinexDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL