Real Browser MCP vs Public Browser

In-depth architectural comparison of the Real Browser MCP and Public Browser MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Real Browser MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: browser_navigate, browser_click, browser_type.

Explore Real Browser MCP Details

Choose Public Browser when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Browser Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: PUBLIC_BROWSER_SCRIPT_TOKEN.

Explore Public Browser Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Real Browser MCP ofershap Browser Automation	Public Browser Browser Automation
Summary	MCP server + Chrome extension that gives AI agents control of the user's real browser with existing sessions, logins, and cookies. No headless browser, no re-authentication.	The most token-efficient MCP server for Chrome automation — a Playwright MCP alternative.
Category & Scope	Browser Automation

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ofershap-real-browser-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "real-browser-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "public-browser": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "public-browser@latest"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons