MCP Server Scraper vs Web Fetcher

In-depth architectural comparison of the MCP Server Scraper and Web Fetcher MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MCP Server Scraper when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: scrape_url, extract_links, extract_metadata.

Explore MCP Server Scraper Details

Choose Web Fetcher when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Search & Data Extraction domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: fetch_page_markdown, extract_metadata, extract_links.

Explore Web Fetcher Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MCP Server Scraper ofershap Search & Data Extraction	Web Fetcher Search & Data Extraction
Summary	Web scraping — extract clean markdown, links, and metadata from any URL. Free Firecrawl alternative.	Turns any web page into clean Markdown, page metadata and classified links for LLMs.
Category & Scope	Search & Data Extraction

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ofershap-mcp-server-scraper": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-scraper"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "web-fetcher": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-server-web-fetcher"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons