Odds Api.net MCP Server vs FutPicks

In-depth architectural comparison of the Odds Api.net MCP Server and FutPicks MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Odds Api.net MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Paid Service).

Explore Odds Api.net MCP Server Details

Choose FutPicks when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Sports domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: flab_picks_today, flab_pick_details, flab_picks_board.

Explore FutPicks Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Odds Api.net MCP Server VerifiedSports	FutPicks Sports
Summary	MCP tools for sports and racing odds, bookmaker comparison, line movement, results, and betting research using the Odds API.	Probable football lineups with start probability and expected fantasy points, graded in public.
Category & Scope	Sports

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "odds-api-net-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "odds-api-net-mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "futpicks": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "futpicks-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons