Octoperf vs Spanlens — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Octoperf vs Spanlens
A side-by-side look at the Octoperf and Spanlens MCP servers: transport, auth, tools, quality signals, and the config to install either one in Claude, Cursor, Windsurf or VS Code.
Verdict: choose Octoperf for monitoring work over a hosted endpoint; choose Spanlens for monitoring as a local process. You can also run both side by side in one mcpServers block.
Which MCP server should you choose?
Choose Octoperf when
You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Spanlens tools
No tool names declared yet. Check the project README from the listing page.
Ready-to-paste client configs
Paste either block (or both) into your client config, e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json. We only show a config when the install command is confirmed.
Octoperf is categorized under Monitoring and uses a remote HTTP/SSE transport. Spanlens belongs to Monitoring and uses a local stdio subprocess. Pick Octoperf for monitoring work and Spanlens for monitoring.
Copy the mcpServers block from the config section on this page into your client's config (for example claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json), then fully restart the client.
Octoperf has no declared pricing — check the project's own site. Spanlens is listed as free. Auth: api key required. If a server needs environment variables such as API keys, define them under the env key in your client's MCP config.
Yes. MCP clients support multiple servers: add octoperf and spanlens-spanlens-2 as separate keys in the same mcpServers object, and your assistant will call tools from either one.
On AllMCPs, Octoperf has a quality signal of 40/100 (Fair) with 2 views, 0 installs and 0 GitHub stars. Spanlens has 59/100 (Good) with 4 views, 0 installs and 13 GitHub stars.