Octopart vs Teamspend

In-depth architectural comparison of the Octopart and Teamspend MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

O

Choose Octopart when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Octopart Details

Choose Teamspend when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Teamspend Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	O Octopart Developer Tools	Teamspend Developer Tools
Summary	Octopart MCP — electronic component search via the Nexar Supply API (GraphQL)	Compares AI coding tool spend before and after a migration via MCP tools.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "octopart": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "octopart"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "teamspend": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "teamspend-cli"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons