Obsify vs Prompt Compass

In-depth architectural comparison of the Obsify and Prompt Compass MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Obsify when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Obsify Details

P

Choose Prompt Compass when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Prompt Compass Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Obsify Developer Tools	P Prompt Compass Developer Tools
Summary	Local, privacy-preserving PII toolkit over MCP — shape to the model, substance stays local.	Decision-only prompt routing and firewall checks for local/cloud routing, PII and jailbreak risk.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obsify": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/inspector"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "prompt-compass": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "prompt-compass"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons