Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Nsf Awards vs Opencellid
In-depth architectural comparison of the Nsf Awards and Opencellid MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Nsf Awards
Databases · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Opencellid
Databases · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Nsf Awards if you need specialized Databases tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Opencellid if your workspace requires Databases integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
N
Choose Nsf Awards when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
O
Choose Opencellid when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Nsf Awards Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Opencellid Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Nsf Awards Configuration
Opencellid Configuration