What is the key difference between Nouz and Obelisk?

Nouz belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with local stdio execution, while Obelisk belongs to the Knowledge & Memory category with local stdio execution.

How do I install Nouz or Obelisk in Claude Desktop or Cursor?

Copy the mcpServers JSON configuration snippet provided on this page into your claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json file and restart your AI client.

Are Nouz and Obelisk free or paid?

Nouz operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required). Obelisk operates under a Free / Open Source model (No auth required).

Which MCP server has more tools and community activity?

Nouz lists 0 tools with 1 views and 18 GitHub stars. Obelisk lists 0 tools with 0 views and 2 GitHub stars.

Can I use both Nouz and Obelisk together in the same MCP host?

Yes! MCP hosts like Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and VS Code support configuring multiple servers under the mcpServers object simultaneously.

Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison

Nouz vs Obelisk

In-depth architectural comparison of the Nouz and Obelisk MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

At a Glance & Executive Verdict

Nouz

Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Obelisk

Knowledge & Memory · Local stdio

Quality: 43/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required

Verdict Summary: Choose Nouz if you need specialized Knowledge & Memory tools running via a local process. Choose Obelisk if your workspace requires Knowledge & Memory integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Nouz when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nouz Details

Choose Obelisk when:

You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Obelisk Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Nouz Knowledge & Memory	O Obelisk Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Semantic knowledge engine for Obsidian with auto-classification and DAG hierarchy	Comment on a passage of an Obsidian note, and propose suggested edits.
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Nouz Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Obelisk Tools (0)

No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

Nouz Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nouz": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "nouz-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Obelisk Configuration

mcpServers (Claude Desktop / Cursor)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "obelisk": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "obelisk-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Frequently Asked Questions

Nouz is categorized under Knowledge & Memory and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Obelisk belongs to Knowledge & Memory using local stdio subprocess. Select Nouz when you need capabilities focused on knowledge & memory and Obelisk when you require tools for knowledge & memory.

More alternatives to Nouz More alternatives to Obelisk Knowledge & Memory category hub