Nooticr vs Ravenpost

In-depth architectural comparison of the Nooticr and Ravenpost MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Nooticr when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_social_media, get_post_transcript, get_post_frames.

Explore Nooticr Details

Choose Ravenpost when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: list_workspaces, list_accounts, list_posts.

Explore Ravenpost Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Nooticr Social Media	Ravenpost Social Media
Summary	Social intelligence for 10 networks: read posts and trends, monitor brand mentions, then create.	Schedule and publish social posts to Instagram, TikTok, X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads and more.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nooticr": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@nooticr/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ravenpost-2": {
      "url": "https://api.ravenpo.st/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons