NomaCMS MCP Server vs Stellify MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the NomaCMS MCP Server and Stellify MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose NomaCMS MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_project, add_project_locale, set_default_project_locale.

Explore NomaCMS MCP Server Details

Choose Stellify MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_project, get_directory, create_directory.

Explore Stellify MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	NomaCMS MCP Server Developer Tools	Stellify MCP Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for NomaCMS. Manage collections, fields, content, assets, and webhooks via AI agents.	Build Laravel apps through conversation. Code stored as structured JSON for surgical AI edits.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nomacms-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@nomacms/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "stellify-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "stellify-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons