NomaCMS MCP Server vs Spines

In-depth architectural comparison of the NomaCMS MCP Server and Spines MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose NomaCMS MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_project, add_project_locale, set_default_project_locale.

Explore NomaCMS MCP Server Details

Choose Spines when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: search_books, get_book_details, get_collection.

Explore Spines Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	NomaCMS MCP Server Developer Tools	Spines Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for NomaCMS. Manage collections, fields, content, assets, and webhooks via AI agents.	Access book collections, reading lists, and bookshelf recognition from AI assistants.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nomacms-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@nomacms/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spines": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@spines/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons