No Shell Agent Architect MCP vs Trazum

In-depth architectural comparison of the No Shell Agent Architect MCP and Trazum MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose No Shell Agent Architect MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore No Shell Agent Architect MCP Details

Choose Trazum when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Trazum Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	No Shell Agent Architect MCP Developer Tools	Trazum Developer Tools
Summary	Turns vague automation requests into tool stacks, prompts, QA checks, and human boundaries.	Trazum as an MCP server: let an agent price and budget its own prompts before it sends them.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "no-shell-agent-architect-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "no-shell-agent-architect-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "trazum": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@trazum/mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons