Neurohive vs MCP External Memory

In-depth architectural comparison of the Neurohive and MCP External Memory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Neurohive when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: store_memory, search_memory, recall_memory.

Explore Neurohive Details

Choose MCP External Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Knowledge & Memory domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: memory_store, memory_search, memory_get.

Explore MCP External Memory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Neurohive Knowledge & Memory	MCP External Memory Knowledge & Memory
Summary	Multi-agent memory intelligence with expertise tracking and conflict detection	An MCP server that gives LLMs persistent, searchable semantic memory
Category & Scope	Knowledge & Memory	Knowledge & Memory
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "neurohive": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "neurohive"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mcp-external-memory": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "mcp-external-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons