Nasa vs Spaceweather MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Nasa and Spaceweather MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

N

Choose Nasa when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: get_apod, get_asteroids, get_mars_photos.

Explore Nasa Details

Choose Spaceweather MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Spaceweather MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	N Nasa Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Spaceweather MCP Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	NASA MCP — wraps NASA Open APIs (api.nasa.gov)	Space weather & geomagnetic conditions (NOAA SWPC, NASA DONKI, USGS, Kyoto) via MCP.
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nasa": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nasa"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "spaceweather-mcp": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "spaceweather-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons