Nasa Eonet vs Meteors

In-depth architectural comparison of the Nasa Eonet and Meteors MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

N

Choose Nasa Eonet when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Nasa Eonet Details

Choose Meteors when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Aerospace & Astrodynamics domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Meteors Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	N Nasa Eonet Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Meteors Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Summary	NASA EONET MCP — Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker	Meteors MCP — NASA fireball, near-Earth asteroid, and close approach data
Category & Scope	Aerospace & Astrodynamics	Aerospace & Astrodynamics
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nasa-eonet": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nasa-eonet"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "meteors": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "meteors"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons