Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Namailu.cz Agent Email vs Postfleet
In-depth architectural comparison of the Namailu.cz Agent Email and Postfleet MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Namailu.cz Agent Email
Communication · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 25/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Postfleet
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 39/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Namailu.cz Agent Email if you need specialized Communication tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Postfleet if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
N
Choose Namailu.cz Agent Email when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
P
Choose Postfleet when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Namailu.cz Agent Email Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Postfleet Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Namailu.cz Agent Email Configuration
Postfleet Configuration