Swift MCP Gui vs Desktop Touch MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Swift MCP Gui and Desktop Touch MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Swift MCP Gui when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: x, y, button.

Explore Swift MCP Gui Details

Choose Desktop Touch MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the OS Automation domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: desktop_discover, desktop_act, desktop_state.

Explore Desktop Touch MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Swift MCP Gui NakaokaRei OS Automation	Desktop Touch MCP Harusame64 OS Automation
Summary	MCP server that can execute commands such as keyboard input and mouse movement	Windows desktop automation for LLM agents with entity-based actions instead of coordinate-only clicking. Uses UIA, CDP, screenshots, keyboard/mouse/clipboard, and terminal control, plus entity leases, verified delivery, causal context, and interaction memory to reduce silent UI automation failures.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "nakaokarei-swift-mcp-gui": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "nakaokarei-swift-mcp-gui"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "harusame64-desktop-touch-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons