Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token vs Nworks
In-depth architectural comparison of the Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token and Nworks MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 47/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Nworks
Workplace & Productivity · Local stdio
Quality: 60/100 (Good) | Auth: OAuth 2.0
Verdict Summary: Choose Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token if you need specialized Workplace & Productivity tools running via a local process. Choose Nworks if your workspace requires Workplace & Productivity integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Workplace & Productivity domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token is categorized under Workplace & Productivity and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Nworks belongs to Workplace & Productivity using local stdio subprocess. Select Multi Account MCP for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, Docs, and Sheets — 61 tools, token when you need capabilities focused on workplace & productivity and Nworks when you require tools for workplace & productivity.