ScreenPilot vs Memory

In-depth architectural comparison of the ScreenPilot and Memory MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose ScreenPilot when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Scrolling.

Explore ScreenPilot Details

Choose Memory when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Other Tools and Integrations domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Knowledge graph-based data storage, Persistent memory for LLMs, Reference implementation for MCP SDK usage.

Explore Memory Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	ScreenPilot Mtehabsim Other Tools and Integrations	Memory VerifiedOther Tools and Integrations
Summary	enables AI to fully control and access GUI interactions by providing tools for mouse and keyboard, ideal for general automation, education, and experimentation.	Knowledge graph-based persistent memory system.
Category & Scope

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mtehabsim-screenpilot": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mtehabsim-screenpilot"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memory": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modelcontextprotocol/server-memory"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons