MSSQL LocalDB MCP vs Supabase

In-depth architectural comparison of the MSSQL LocalDB MCP and Supabase MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose MSSQL LocalDB MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore MSSQL LocalDB MCP Details

Choose Supabase when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Databases domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Supabase Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	MSSQL LocalDB MCP Databases	Supabase Databases
Summary	MCP server for SQL Server Express LocalDB on Windows: manage instances, run T-SQL, discover DBs	Your Supabase account in natural language: run SQL, apply migrations, manage tables, storage, edge f
Category & Scope	Databases	Databases
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mssql-localdb-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mssql-localdb-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "supabase-2": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "supabase-2"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons