Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
MSGraph MCP vs Outlook Personal MCP
In-depth architectural comparison of the MSGraph MCP and Outlook Personal MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
MSGraph MCP
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Outlook Personal MCP
Communication · Local stdio
Quality: 27/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose MSGraph MCP if you need specialized Communication tools running via a local process. Choose Outlook Personal MCP if your workspace requires Communication integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
M
Choose MSGraph MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
O
Choose Outlook Personal MCP when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Communication domain.
- You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
MSGraph MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Outlook Personal MCP Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
MSGraph MCP Configuration
Outlook Personal MCP Configuration