Mossgate MCP vs Petra402

In-depth architectural comparison of the Mossgate MCP and Petra402 MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Mossgate MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: other (Paid Service).
• You have access to required keys: MOSSGATE_BUYER_PK.
• Primary tools included: Token verdict and full report tools, Wallet behavioral risk profiling, URL or HTML rendering.

Explore Mossgate MCP Details

P

Choose Petra402 when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Finance & Fintech domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Petra402 Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Mossgate MCP Finance & Fintech	P Petra402 Finance & Fintech
Summary	mcp stdio server exposing mossgate trust and rue render apis with x402 usdc payment	Public web page to markdown, paid per call with x402. First 10 calls free, no signup.
Category & Scope	Finance & Fintech	Finance & Fintech
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mossgate-mcp": {
      "url": "https://api.mossgate.dev"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "petra402": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "petra402"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons