Depguard vs Opa Mcp Server — MCP Server Comparison | AllMCPs
Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Depguard vs Opa Mcp Server
In-depth architectural comparison of the Depguard and Opa Mcp Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Depguard
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 51/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Opa Mcp Server
Security · Local stdio
Quality: 55/100 (Good) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Depguard if you need specialized Security tools running via a local process. Choose Opa Mcp Server if your workspace requires Security integration with local subprocess execution. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's mcpServers manifest.
Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
Choose Depguard when:
You need dedicated capabilities in the Security domain.
You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Primary tools included: Pre-install package verification and audit, Static code analysis and dead-dependency detection, Vulnerability audit using npm and GitHub Advisory databases.
Pre-install guardian for npm packages with static code analysis, supply-chain attack detection, vulnerability audit (npm + GitHub Advisory Database), AI hallucination guard, and CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation with VEX. 28 MCP tools. Zero runtime dependencies — the SBOM serializer is implemented natively against the public CycloneDX schema.
Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Rego policy toolkit. 32 tools spanning authoring (format, lint, check, deps), evaluation (eval, test, bench, coverage), and OPA REST control (policies, data, decisions, compile). Wraps the OPA CLI and the Regal linter, with AI-assisted helpers for explaining decisions, generating test skeletons, and suggesting fixes.
Category & Scope
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Depguard Tools (6)
Pre-install package verification and audit
Static code analysis and dead-dependency detection
Vulnerability audit using npm and GitHub Advisory databases
AI hallucination guard to detect typosquats and fake packages
CycloneDX 1.6 SBOM generation with VEX support
SARIF v2.1.0 output for GitHub Code Scanning integration
Opa Mcp Server Tools (52)
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Depguard is categorized under Security and uses a local stdio subprocess. In contrast, Opa Mcp Server belongs to Security using local stdio subprocess. Select Depguard when you need capabilities focused on security and Opa Mcp Server when you require tools for security.
Run Regal across a file or directory. Returns findings grouped by category. **Requires `regal` on `PATH` or `REGAL_BINARY` set.
rego_parse_ast
Parse Rego to AST JSON. Wraps `opa parse`.
rego_inspect
Inspect a bundle or directory: packages, rules, annotations. Wraps `opa inspect`.
rego_capabilities
Return the capabilities (built-ins, future keywords) understood by the bundled OPA.
rego_deps
Static dependency analysis: rule-level data references and cross-package calls.
rego_migrate_v1
Migrate Rego v0 source to v1 syntax. Runs `opa fmt --rego-v1` then validates with `opa check --v1-compatible`. Returns `{ original, migrated, changed, valid, errors }`.
rego_check_schema
Check Rego against a JSON Schema. Validates that every `input.*` field the policy reads exists in the schema using `opa check --schema`. Accepts inline schema or a path to a JSON Schema file on disk.
rego_eval
Evaluate a query against a policy and input. The bread-and-butter tool.
rego_eval_with_explain
Evaluate with `--explain=full` and return a structured trace.
rego_eval_with_profile
Evaluate with `--profile` and return per-rule timing and evaluation counts.