Modusop MCP vs Runrun.it MCP Server

In-depth architectural comparison of the Modusop MCP and Runrun.it MCP Server MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Modusop MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Modusop MCP Details

R

Choose Runrun.it MCP Server when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Runrun.it MCP Server Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Modusop MCP Developer Tools	R Runrun.it MCP Server Developer Tools
Summary	MCP server for ModusOp — projects, tasks, time tracking, and retainers for AI assistants.	MCP server for Runrun.it: Tasks, Comments, Projects
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "modusop-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@modusop/mcp-server"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "runrun-it-mcp-server": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "mcp-runrunit"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons