Side-by-Side Model Context Protocol Comparison
Modem vs Evermuse
In-depth architectural comparison of the Modem and Evermuse MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.
At a Glance & Executive Verdict
Modem
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 30/100 (Emerging) | Auth: No auth required
Evermuse
Developer Tools · Remote HTTP/SSE
Quality: 42/100 (Fair) | Auth: No auth required
Verdict Summary: Choose Modem if you need specialized Developer Tools tools running via a hosted cloud SSE transport. Choose Evermuse if your workspace requires Developer Tools integration with remote web transport. Both servers can be configured concurrently in your client's
mcpServers manifest.Which MCP Server Should You Choose?
M
Choose Modem when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
E
Choose Evermuse when:
- You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
- You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
- Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
Feature & Specification Comparison
Tools & Capabilities Breakdown
Modem Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Evermuse Tools (0)
No explicit tool names declared in metadata yet. Check project README on main listing page.
Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations
Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).
Modem Configuration
Evermuse Configuration
Frequently Asked Questions
More alternatives to ModemMore alternatives to EvermuseDeveloper Tools category hubCanonical compare URL