Model Wellness vs Glean

In-depth architectural comparison of the Model Wellness and Glean MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Model Wellness when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Model Wellness Details

Choose Glean when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Glean Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Model Wellness Developer Tools	Glean Developer Tools
Summary	Binary Banya — an AI spa supporting model wellness. Free, no-auth treatments for LLM agents.	Remote MCP Server that securely connects Glean Enterprise Knowledge with your IDE, LLM, or agents.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "model-wellness": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "--from"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "glean-2": {
      "url": "https://developers.glean.com/img/glean-text.svg"
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons