Misterdev vs Code Runner

In-depth architectural comparison of the Misterdev and Code Runner MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Misterdev when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Misterdev Details

Choose Code Runner when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Developer Tools domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Code Runner Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Misterdev Developer Tools	Code Runner Developer Tools
Summary	Autonomous LLM build orchestrator that plans, edits, and verifies code across languages.	Code Runner MCP Server which can run code in various programming languages.
Category & Scope	Developer Tools	Developer Tools
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "misterdev": {
      "command": "uvx",
      "args": [
        "misterdev"
      ]
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "code-runner": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "for"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons