Umami MCP vs Speedofme MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Umami MCP and Speedofme MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

Choose Umami MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: API Key required (Free / Open Source).
• You have access to required keys: UMAMI_URL, UMAMI_USERNAME, UMAMI_PASSWORD, UMAMI_API_KEY.
• Primary tools included: list_websites, get_website, create_website.

Explore Umami MCP Details

Choose Speedofme MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Monitoring domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).
• Primary tools included: Accurate speed testing via 129 Fastly edge servers worldwide, Analytics dashboard for visualizing speed test data, Local history storage of speed test results.

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	Umami MCP mikusnuz Monitoring	Speedofme MCP speedofme-dev Monitoring
Summary
Category & Scope	Monitoring	Monitoring
Quality signal

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "mikusnuz-umami-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "@mikusnuz/umami-mcp"
      ],
      "env": {
        "UMAMI_URL": "YOUR_UMAMI_URL_HERE",
        "UMAMI_USERNAME": "YOUR_UMAMI_USERNAME_HERE",
        "UMAMI_PASSWORD": "YOUR_UMAMI_PASSWORD_HERE",
        "UMAMI_API_KEY": "YOUR_UMAMI_API_KEY_HERE"
      }
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "speedofme-dev-speedofme-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "speedofme-dev-speedofme-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons