Meta Ads MCP by Markifact vs Sociavault MCP

In-depth architectural comparison of the Meta Ads MCP by Markifact and Sociavault MCP MCP servers. Compare execution transports, security boundaries, tool capabilities, quality scores, and ready-to-paste client installation snippets for Claude, Cursor, Windsurf, and VS Code.

Which MCP Server Should You Choose?

M

Choose Meta Ads MCP by Markifact when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer remote streaming HTTP/SSE transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Meta Ads MCP by Markifact Details

Choose Sociavault MCP when:

• You need dedicated capabilities in the Social Media domain.
• You prefer local stdio subprocess transport architecture.
• Your security boundary fits: No auth required (Free / Open Source).

Explore Sociavault MCP Details

Feature & Specification Comparison

Specification	M Meta Ads MCP by Markifact Social Media	Sociavault MCP Social Media
Summary	Meta Ads MCP: Facebook and Instagram reports, campaigns, creatives, audiences. Approval on writes.	Scrape social data from TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, and ad libraries.
Category & Scope	Social Media	Social Media

Tools & Capabilities Breakdown

Ready-to-Paste Client Configurations

Paste either (or both) of these JSON server blocks into your client config file (e.g. claude_desktop_config.json or ~/.cursor/mcp.json).

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "meta-ads-mcp-by-markifact": {
      "url": "https://api.markifact.com/mcp/meta-ads"
    }
  }
}

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "sociavault-mcp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": [
        "-y",
        "sociavault-mcp"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Related MCP Server Comparisons